Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Water


It is surprising how often we use water in our day to day lives. We use it to cook, to wash, for hygienic purposes, to farm, to do laundry - almost everything we do requires the use of water. Most of us in the developed world don’t realize the full value of this resource and just how much we need it because we have always had it in abundance. An astonishing and rather sad stat I came across is that “approximately 3.575 million people die each year from water-related diseases.” This really got me thinking, because here in North America, we use water without even considering whether it is safe for us to use or not; clean water is all we have ever known. We simply expect the faucet to release clear, clean water with one turn of the tap, continuing to flow until we turn the tap again. We control our use of water, and can pretty much have it as soon as we desire it.

Think about this, the water in our toilets – water we use to flush our waste – is cleaner than what some people living in slums use as drinking water. I feel a little sick when I think about this disparity. No man, child, or mother should have to die from a basic necessity that humankind requires to live and that should be shared amongst the entire population of our planet – clean water should be considered a human right not a commodity. What really irks me is that most slum communities lack ACCESS to sanitary water. What does that even mean? Pretty much that countries have the water available but something comes in the way of the people who desire to use it. According to Water.org, “people living in the slums often pay 5-10 times more per litre of water than wealthy people living in the same city.” This is primarily because of the privatization of the resource, making it unaffordable to some people. This brings us back to the question of whether water should be considered as a commodity or a human right. There is also the contemplation of natural disasters such as hurricanes, tsunamis, or earthquakes that can potentially worsen the water quality in a region. This was a devastating consequence of the Indonesian Tsunami of 2004. What can one do under these circumstances?

My friend Moin gave me this link to watch a few days ago (Thanks Moin): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXepkIWPhFQ. A man named Michael Pritchard invented a machine, Lifesaver, which sterilizes contaminated water so that it is safe to drink. He uses science to explain the technology. Basically, the smallest virus and bacteria are 200 nanometres and 25 nanometres respectively, and the pump has pores that are 15 nanometres big, barricading any unwanted parasites from getting through. This idea suggests that instead of shipping sterile water from developed countries as a form of aid, we should just use the water Mother Nature provides and make it sterile with Lifesaver. It costs about 5 cents per day to run, and Canada spends billions of dollars on foreign aid, most of it ineffective anyway due to the outdated approach of utilizing that aid.

With 8 billion dollars invested into this technology, the Sub goal of the 7th Millennium Development Goal of halving the population without sufficient access to safe drinking water by 2015 can be met. I truly believe that good utilization of foreign aid is investing in simple technologies such as Lifesaver because the public can learn to use these technologies themselves. They can sterilize and use water resources available nearby, instead of traveling far distances or paying unrealistic amounts of money. Once access to safe drinking water, a basic requirement for survival, is no longer a concern for poor communities, they can focus on bettering their quality of life through education, health care, and income generation. Water is fundamental for life, it should be considered a human right, and therefore should be shared by all of the planet’s inhabitants.


-Madiha

12 comments:

  1. Can you clarify what you meant by quote:["With 8 billion dollars invested into this technology, the Sub goal of the 7th Millennium Development Goal of halving the population without sufficient access to safe drinking water by 2015 can be met."]? Is 8 billion dollars already invested or is that the target so that the population without access can be halved? Otherwise great post and I fully agree with you that water as a basic need for life is a human right, and not as commodity that should be controlled. I guess that is part of the root of the problem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment Kavi! According to Michael Pritchard, IF 8 billion dollars of foreign aid is invested in this technology then the amount of people who lack access to safe drinking water can be halved by 2015. Much of foreign aid is ineffectively used and thus does not improve developing communities. foreign aid would be so much more effective if it is invested in simple technologies like these. Im glad you liked it!

      Delete
  2. Awesome post! Water isn't a luxury or a want, it's an essential human need. How close is this lifesaver technology to mass production? Also you mentioned it costs $0.05 to run each day - what is the initial cost per unit? Any possibility of manufacturing them in developing countries as well? That would create some new jobs too!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment Jalz! All of the information about this technology can be found here: http://www.lifesaversystems.com/_blog/Michael%27s_Blog/

      I think you will enjoy reading up on it! I have always been a big fan of simple technologies, I think they have such potential for empowerment!

      Delete
  3. I found this post really interesting! I can't wait to watch the video clip. Do you really think it's realistic to meet the MDG by 2015? I think there's great potential for good results, but not in just 3 years time.
    With that being said, it's also debatable whether the initiative will best succeed with government investment or private investment? This seems like an initiative that grassroots NGOs could really push.

    What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think if simple technologies were invested in earlier, then certain sub-goals of MDG's (such as the one I discussed above) could have definitely been met! If foreign aid is utilized better, I believe there is still hope to lessen some of the population that lack safe drinking water!
      The thing with simple technologies is that they are best executed from the grassroots level, so definitely through NGO's rather than GO's
      Im glad you liked my post! I love reading your comments!

      Delete
  4. That was a great post Maddy! I love how you are so involved and interested in the conservation of water and saving lives with simple technologies. Water is a scarce resource and more and more people need to realize that. Even though 70% of the Earth's surface is made of water, only 2.5% of that is fresh/drinkable water and the rest is ice and groundwater. That's why i really admire what Michael Pritchard's technology has done, as he is making use of the filthy water and turning that into freshwater which is so simple, cheap and genius at the same time.

    Ok so I found another technology for you which I saw a while ago. This one creates light with the use of a soda bottle, water and sunlight! Check it out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHTD_RX3J2I.
    Also the inventor of this is from South East Asia, so you should try and get in touch with him when you're in Vietnam. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks so much Moin! Im a huge fan of conserving natural resources and educating the public on how to use them efficiently. I think it all starts with giving people the means. Simple technologies are so admirable and I think more foreign aid should be invested in them! I really admire Paul Polak's work too, I think I told you about him earlier!

      I cant wait to read up on this light technology! You always have such interesting finds!

      Make sure to keep updated with my blog! :)

      Delete
  5. This is an amazing post Madiha. With the inventions of affordable water cleansing systems, such as LifeSaver, more and more countries would be willing to financially invest into technology like this and that allows countries in poverty to attain clean drinking water. With more emphasis being put into providing clean water, and newer technology coming out to aid in this process; I think the goal that has been set out can not only be met, but exceeded.
    Great post:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Irshad :). I loved talking to you about this post in general, you really shone some light on everything I discuss in this post. Thanks for all of your support, you're the best!

      Delete
  6. Liked this post, got me thinking and interested in the topic. Might base my research paper on it. Its interesting the little necessities we take for granted. I grew up in a community where we didn't always have access to water all the time, the taps run at particular hours of the day, but as i grew older things got better, thanks to the good old water tank, yet still we had to have 3 as a back up to store up the water. I often forget the days we had to travel far for water. Good job madiha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Akua for this beautiful comment! I am so glad my post inspired your essay and I think it would be a great topic for you to further explore! It is funny how often we take something as common as water for granted eh? Please contact me if you have further questions regarding your essay topic!

      Delete